Can Anyone Compete with Facebook?
In 2007, when I was living in the San Francisco Bay Area, I discovered that, while my friends in Orlando were quick to adopt everything from Myspace to Flickr to Twitter, people in Silicon Valley avoided signing up for multiple forms of social media. For them, Facebook was the present and future king of all social networking. The reason? Managing too many different accounts was overwhelming, and Facebook effectively streamlined everything one wanted – from status and news updates … to photo sharing … to event posting – on one, easy-to-use site.
So how has Facebook managed this? It isn’t always because they had the best ideas first … but it is because they recognized value in other social media outlets and integrated facets of several of them. Recently, the site added Places, a spin on Foursquare’s geo-tagging application – putting the juggernaut in direct competition with Foursquare, a fledging start-up that has increased its user base this year, but hasn’t quite become the next big thing that some experts predicted. And, last week, Facebook did it again by introducing a new profile layout that puts job and education information in an easy-to-see location at the top of user profiles, and also allows people to add specific job details … a move that social media expert Peter Shankman believes could be “checkmate” for LinkedIn.
Only time will tell how Facebook’s new features and applications impact other social networking sites – but with the company moving full-steam ahead, it doesn’t appear that the trend of adopting ideas and tweaking them is short-term. And, it begs the question: If Facebook already does it and I have an account with them, why would I bother trying to manage another site or application?
What do you think? Would you prefer to use Facebook for all your social media needs or do you think that Facebook can’t provide the same benefits that other applications do? And do you think the “little guys” have a chance of surviving?
